×

Warning

JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 983
log in

News

News

News

A trip back in time with the Ford Model T

You can call it bucket list item number 345 or what have you, but either way it was a red-letter day for your intrepid auto journalist—well, “black-letter” day may be more appropriate.

 

After 20-plus years spent studying and reading up on the world’s first mass-produced car, the Ford Model T, I was granted the chance to go for a ride in one. This special treat was thanks to Ford, its archives team and of course car owner Dale McDermott and driver Tom Butterworth. Butterworth is also a Model T owner, and the handful of auto scribes that were on-hand that day are indebted to him for braving the subzero temperatures of Northern Michigan and chauffeuring us about.

 

 

After the Ford Model T’s release in 1908 up to its production end in 1927, almost 15 million units were produced. To quote Henry Ford, the Model T was available “in any colour, as long as it’s black,” hence the need for an adjustment to the red-to-black adage above.

 

Why old car photos always seem to feature drivers and passengers dressed in all manner of body-warming garb may seem obvious, you have to ask: did they only drive in the winter in the ‘20s? The photos sure suggest that they did. Take a ride in a Model T, however, and you’ll see what those artists were on about, even if they did add a flowing scarf or two by their own accord to convey a better sense of romance and speed.

 

It comes from all angles; the front, sides, rear—everywhere and it’s relentless, even though we were only cruising at parking lot speeds. After my ride, I can now understand those photos, because this was an all-out assault on my cold-weather sensors.

 

But it didn’t matter. The ride was all that I hoped it would be, and in fact, once you got past the wind buffeting it was a surprisingly supple and comfortable ride even though you’re riding on a set of 30-inch rims. Take that, modern cars!

 

The seats may be small, but the diamond tufted leather is actually comfortable. The leaf springs took us through bumps with nowhere near the bounce I thought we’d feel, although we had our slow speed to thank for that. 

 

Being an auto journalist, I’m a gearhead and so the way the car was driven was a sight to behold in itself. There are three pedals, but they don’t do what you’d expect; they’re in fact for low-gear, high-gear and neutral. There are steering column-mounted stalks, but one of these is the throttle, the other the spark advance for the ignition. That thing that looks like it could be the gear lever? That’s the brake. 

 

Really, when you think about it, the only thing that does what it looks like it’s supposed to do is the wooden steering wheel. That works as advertised.

 
  • 0
  • Published in News
  • Written by

Hyundai, Kia to pay millions in fuel settlement

 

Hyundai and its sister company Kia said Monday that they will pay up to $395 million to consumers as part of a proposed settlement over overstated gas mileage.

 

The Environmental Protection Agency found inflated numbers on 13 Hyundai and Kia vehicles in November of 2012.

 

Hyundai and Kia acknowledged the problem, changed the fuel economy numbers and blamed a procedural error. Since then, Hyundai and Kia have been compensating owners with payments of around $88 annually, which is based on the amount the mileage was overstated and the average price of gasoline.

 

 

Hyundai Motor Co. and Kia Motors are also offering an option of a lump-sum payment. The companies put a figure to it Monday, saying Hyundai would pay up to $210 million and Kia up to $185 million. The total value depends on how many consumers opt for the one-time payment instead of the annual reimbursement.

 

The companies say the lump-sum payment amount varies but would average $353 per Hyundai owner and lessees and $667 for Kia.

 

Consumers also have a choice of a dealership credit.

 

The vehicles involved include the Hyundai Azera, Accent, Genesis, Santa Fe, Sonata Hybrid, Tucson and Veloster and the Kia Optima Hybrid, Rio, Sorento, Soul and Sportage.

 

The settlement still needs court approval, which the companies anticipate seeking in early 2014.

  • 0
  • Published in News
  • Written by

Are Battery Electric Vehicles in your immediate future?

It was 1886 when the generally accepted birth of the automobile occurred – the Benz Patent-Motorwagen conceived and built by German-born Karl Benz.

 

 

 

In 1908 with the introduction of the Ford Model T in North America, automobiles became more affordable – for some. For gasoline-powered vehicles there was, however an all too familiar issue; a lack of infrastructure. In other words, gas stations were few and far between and driving anything but shorter distances was the rule, not the exception.

 

All that changed once it became apparent that the gasoline-powered vehicle and the internal combustion engine was no mere fad.

 

Today, there are more than 1 billion automobiles on roads all over the world – and that number is unlikely to diminish anytime soon.

 

Today, some say the future rests with battery electric vehicles (BEVs). Once again, we have a classic chicken and egg situation. There is no real, nationwide network of charging stations in Canada or the United States – there is a lack of infrastructure. At best, disparate pockets often are appearing as afterthoughts in too few public locations.

 

What charging options are available today for those forward-thinking pioneers who privately own a Nissan Leaf, Ford C-Max – or even a Tesla Model S?

 

 

AC L1 Charging – Most owners get the energy their BEV needs for a daily commute by plugging their car into a standard 120-volt home outlet. This is the slowest method of charging, but it requires no special equipment other than a dedicated electrical cable that comes with the car. Typically L1 charging provides an average of five to eight kilometres of driving per hour of charging. For a typical commuter who travels 60 kilometres a day, it is possible to completely recharge the car overnight. BEVs that stay plugged in for 14 hours overnight can store power for up to 110 kilometres of driving – dependent upon the storage capacity of a vehicle’s batteries.

 

 

AC L2 Charging – Many BEVs give owners the option of installing a 240-volt charging station in their garage, carport, or driveway. This is L2 charging. It cuts charging times roughly in half, but requires installation of a dedicated electrical circuit (similar to that used for a clothes dryer) and the purchase of a charging unit that costs between $750 and $1,500. Most L2 stations provide an average of about 15 kilometres of driving per hour of charging. This means a vehicle with a 125 kilometre range can be fully recharged in eight hours or less. Some newer BEVs are equipped with power inverters (the onboard component that changes AC to DC for charging the battery) that have twice the capacity of earlier designs. This doubles the kilometres of driving per hour of charge from 15 to 30, while cutting the overall charging time in half to roughly four hours – or four times the speed of L1 charging.

 

DC L3 Fast Charging – Some BEVs are equipped with electrical connections for fast charging using a high-current DC power source. An L3 station is capable of charging a BEV four to six times faster than an AC charger – a full charge can be achieved in less than an hour. However, the cost of the required high-voltage electrical circuit and special charging equipment (typically in the range $15,000 to $25,000 per unit) makes true L3 fast-charging stations rare.

 

According to the latest data available from the U.S. Department of Energy, there are currently 8,332 public charging stations available across that country. The greatest concentration is in California with 1,679 units – which is also the state with the largest number of registered BEVs – 33,418 as stated in the recently published World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Canada Transportation rEVolution report. A breakdown of types of charger was not available at press time, but statistically, the majority is likely to be L1. “Public” refers to those units in parking lots, outside restaurants and stores – not individual homes or apartment buildings.

 

That same report shows that industry-leading EV adopter Norway has, by comparison 14,462 BEVs on the road representing 3.10% of all vehicle sales. There are also 4,029 public charging stations. On a per capita basis, Norway leads the charge towards green methods of transportation, especially when powered by electricity. In fact, that country has a goal of 200,000 BEVs as viable means of transport by the year 2020.

 

 

How does Canada stack up? The same WWF study shows that there are 4,059 BEVs on the road compared to more than 20 million conventional vehicles. That number of BEVs is 20% off the WWF target as of August 2013. Significantly lower numbers than the recognized leaders – and that is with a 148% growth this year alone.  And yet, surprisingly enough, the WWF has stated that their goal for BEVs in this country by 2020 is 600,000 units. Getting to that point in seven years would appear to be an enormous undertaking. That same report states there are now 1,119 public charging stations driven largely by pro-active initiatives in British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec. In fact, B.C. led the way with 475 unique stations installed in under a year. 

 

In all jurisdictions, the true breakdown of L1, L2 or L3 chargers is unknown.

 

No matter how you look at it, especially in Canada, the numbers are woefully small. 

 

Recently Saskatchewan-based Sun Country Highway valiantly built and opened 17, L2 stations along Highway 401 from Detroit to Montreal offering free electric fuel for plug-in drivers at intervals between 50 to 98 kilometres, making it (somewhat) easier to drive long distances using little or no fossil fuels. Fine if you happen to be driving that particular corridor. Do the math; how long would it take to drive from Windsor to Montreal in a “normal” BEV? Is that realistic?

 

Many developers are considering adding charging stations in specific areas of condominium apartment buildings’ underground parking. And some attractions, such as Evergreen Brickworks, an eco-friendly and model of sustainability in Toronto, added solar-powered chargers manufactured by industry-leading Schneider Electric a couple of years ago.

 

Will there be an epiphany any time soon? There’s the rub. The WWF study shows that only 28% of Canadians think (not believe) that BEVs are a viable option while only 7% have seen, driven or ridden in one.

 

The WWF has a stated goal; access to 30,000 workplace or public charging locations by 2020. Remember publicly, that’s to service 600,000 BEVs. Presently Canada has access to nine different BEV models; California sells 16. The WWF stated goal is that all North American models will be available in Canada by 2015. With a greater choice will more individuals take the plunge?

 

Are all the goals optimistic – or insurmountable? Currently, only three provinces, B.C., Ontario and Quebec offer incentives to purchase BEVs – up to $8,500. Without buy-in across the majority of this country and provincial and even the Federal government investigating other opportunities to internalize the environmental costs of so-called conventional vehicles through mechanisms such as carbon taxes, progress may be challenging.

 

What might trigger a tipping point?

 

Infrastructure may be one issue – perhaps the largest. Another may be a lack of ongoing incentives and even vehicle choice. Being considered eco-minded may not be enough. There will always be a pervasive “what-have-you-done-for-me-lately” attitude. Look at Norway (again); all BEV owners have access to free parking in major cities and no-charge access to HOV lanes on highways. It is estimated that the value to an individual may be anywhere from US$3,000 to US$8,000 – each and every year.

 

Is that “green” enough for you? 

 
  • 0
  • Published in News
  • Written by

Ford Unveils Fusion Hybrid Research Vehicle

 

Hot on the heels of the Ford Edge Concept we saw at the Los Angeles Auto Show, Ford recently revealed a real, working version of a car that can not only park itself, but drive itself as well. This is thanks to what is essentially a laser-guidance system called Light Detection and Ranging (“LiDAR” for short). 

 

 

See those cones on the Fusion Hybrid pictured? Each one contains eight separate lasers that are constantly scanning the surroundings of the car, with a swept area of 100 meters. Each laser is capable of transmitting 7,000 data points per second, taking into account the car’s surroundings and literally creating a 3D map of the world. Ford says that the satellite technology will help future drivers in gridlock, as the lasers take into account surrounding vehicles. It doesn’t stop there; the lasers can detect people and buildings, and display them on a laptop tethered to the car. This, ostensibly, would be changed to a more practical in-car monitor mounted in the car’s centre stack.

 

It was quite something to be standing beside the car, only to look up at the large screen they had on-hand and see the virtual image of yourself there. Wave, and watch as your virtual-self waves back. 

 

 

 

The theory is simply thus: the lasers can see all around, all at once while the human eye can only focus on a certain focal point. It sounds like it should be a safer way to go, right? 

 

Perhaps, but the Ford folks on-hand were adamant that they weren’t out to win the driverless car sweepstakes, but to use the prototype as a showcase for their suite of autonomous driver aids that will make appearances in future Ford vehicles. 

 

  • 0
  • Published in News
  • Written by

Drive Clean fees to be lowered in Ontario

TORONTO - Ontario's Liberal government will announce plans today to lower the $35 fee for the Drive Clean vehicle emission tests.

 

Drive Clean is supposed to be a revenue-neutral program to get cars that spew pollution off the road, but it is now turning a profit of $19 million.

 

 

The government has promised to address the issue and lower the charge that drivers pay every two years to get their vehicles tested, but still haven't said what the new rate will be.

 

The Progressive Conservatives say Drive Clean, which was introduced in 1999, has outlived its usefulness and should be eliminated because most cars and light trucks easily pass the test.

 

Ontario changed its Drive Clean procedures last January to use onboard diagnostic testing equipment instead of tail pipe emissions, which has led to an average 10 per cent failure rates.

 

The emissions tests are mandatory for vehicles at least seven years old.

 

British Columbia is planning to phase out its version of Drive Clean next year.

  • 0
  • Published in News
  • Written by

MINI shows off images of the new John Cooper Works concept for NAIAS

 

At the Los Angeles Auto Show, we saw the 2014 MINI Cooper all-grown up. It took on an all-new original form, but with a larger grille, longer wheelbase and filled with driver assistance packages.

 

Fast forward a few weeks and MINI has provided a preview of its performance-minded John Cooper Works concept before its reveal at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit.

 

 

Even though it’s performance-based, MINI won’t let the engine specs out of the bag. What they did reveal focused on design. The main highlights are 18-inch alloy wheels and an upgraded aerodynamics kit that will help at higher speeds. The John Cooper Works will have larger air intakes, LED headlights, a black grille frame and rear spoiler.

 

The colours in the teasers of the John Cooper Works concept featured stand out. The predominant colour is being called Bright Highways Gray and it’s accented by Chili Red lines and touches.

 

 

MINI has been capturing plenty of attention by refining and redefining the Cooper vehicle and we expect nothing less in Detroit. However, we will have to wait and see what’s in store starting January 14th on the press days. Stay tuned for more information to follow, but in the meantime, enjoy the pictures.

 

 

 

 
  • 0
  • Published in News
  • Written by

Toyota to enter settlement negotiations stemming from recalls

SANTA ANA, CA - Toyota, after a four-year legal battle, is entering settlement talks on nearly 400 U.S. lawsuits that allege sudden unintended acceleration problems with its vehicles led to deaths and injuries.

 

Joint motions filed late Thursday in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana and Los Angeles County Superior Court indicated both sides would begin an "intensive settlement process" next month.

 

The Japanese automaker, which has recalled millions of cars since 2009 over the acceleration issue, agreed to the negotiations to make resolving the cases more efficient, spokeswoman Carly Schaffner told The Associated Press on Friday.

 

"We continue to stand behind the safety and quality of our vehicles," she said.

 

 

 

Cases that don't settle after a two-stage mediation process will go back to court for trial, said plaintiffs' co-lead counsel Mark Robinson Jr., but most of the 375 claims will likely get resolved.

 

"It's not practical to try all these cases," he said. "You've got two chances to get your case settled and if you're a plaintiff, at least you're not just sitting in some file in the courthouse."

 

The settlement negotiations come less than two months after an Oklahoma jury awarded a total of $3 million in damages to the injured driver of a 2005 Camry and to the family of a passenger who was killed.

 

The ruling was significant because Toyota had won all previous unintended acceleration cases that went to trial. It was also the first case where attorneys for plaintiffs argued that the car's electronics — in this case the software connected to the Camry's electronic throttle-control system — were the cause of the unintended acceleration.

 

At the time, legal experts said the Oklahoma verdict might cause Toyota to consider a broad settlement of the remaining cases. Until then, Toyota had been riding momentum from several trials where juries found it was not liable.

 

Robinson said attorneys for plaintiffs had been discussing a streamlined settlement process with Toyota before that verdict, but the Oklahoma case "couldn't have hurt" those talks.

 

 

 

Toyota has blamed drivers, stuck accelerators or floor mats that trapped the gas pedal for the acceleration claims that led to the big recalls of Camrys and other vehicles. The company has repeatedly denied its vehicles are flawed.

 

No recalls have been issued related to problems with onboard electronics. In the Oklahoma case, Toyota attorneys theorized that the driver mistakenly pumped the gas pedal instead of the brake when her Camry ran through an intersection and slammed into an embankment.

 

Sean Kane, president of Massachusetts-based Safety Research & Strategies, said the Oklahoma verdict likely moved Toyota to the negotiating table because it targeted electronics.

 

"Nobody did until that case and they got hammered — and they got hammered in a conservative venue," said Kane, who researches consumer safety in motor vehicles for plaintiff attorneys and has been closely following the Toyota litigation.

 

"The evidence that came out in that trial has attracted global attention that is remarkable," he said.

 

After the verdict, jurors told AP they believed the testimony of an expert who said he found flaws in the car's electronics. They also pointed to 150 feet (50 metres) of skid marks on the road as evidence the driver was desperately trying to brake.

 

"What makes the accelerator open? The computer," juror Vickie Potter said after the verdict.

 

Toyota pointed out that no one has been able to replicate the unintended high-speed acceleration despite access to the automaker's software.

 

"The bottom line is that there are no real-world scenarios in which Toyota electronics can cause a high-speed unintended acceleration event," Schaffner, the Toyota spokeswoman, said at the time.

 

Toyota previously agreed to pay more than $1 billion to resolve hundreds of lawsuits claiming that owners of its cars suffered economic losses because of the recalls. But that settlement did not include those suing over wrongful death and injuries. Those lawsuits have been consolidated in the state and federal courts in California.

 

In October, Toyota won a California state court case in which plaintiffs argued the automaker was liable for the death of a woman whose 2006 Camry crashed because the company hadn't installed a system that could override the accelerator. The woman's family was seeking $20 million in damages.

 

Associated Press Writers Tom Krisher in Detroit and Sean Murphy in Oklahoma City contributed to this report.

  • 0
  • Published in News
  • Written by

Winter protection advice with help from Autoglym

Cyn Stone dives deep into the topic of wash, polish and protect with the people at Autoglym. We learn some fascinating tips on how to keep your vehicle prepared for those winter months that lay ahead.

 

 

 

 

  • 0
  • Published in News
  • Written by

NAIAS finalists revealed, GM honoured with 3 of 6 spots

 

During the Automotive Press Association luncheon in Detroit, the final six finalists were named for the 2014 North American Car and Truck of the Year awards. 

 

A jury of 48 automotive journalists selected the Cadillac CTS, Chevrolet Corvette Stingray and the Mazda3 for Car of the Year, as well as the Acura MDX, Chevrolet Silverado and Jeep Cherokee for Truck/Utility vehicle of the Year.

 

All of the vehicles tested had to be new or redesigned for at the least the 2013 year to be in consideration. After a second round of judging, four American vehicles are still in contention with three of them being from General Motors.

 

 

Last year’s awards went to a General Motors product as well, the Cadillac ATS; while the Ram 1500 came away with the truck award.

 

The winners will be announced on January 13th on press day at the North American International Auto Show. 

 
  • 0
  • Published in News
  • Written by

Mary Barra takes over for Dan Akerson as CEO of GM

 

It’s been a big day for General Motors with a changing of the guard announcement at the top of the food chain. It was announced that the Chairman and CEO of General Motors, Dan Akerson was stepping down to be replaced by Mary Barra, the executive vice president of Global Product Development, Purchasing and Supply Chain.

 

The switch will occur on January 15th, 2014, making Barra the first female CEO in the global automotive industry. 

 

Since taking over on September 1st, 2010, Akerson, 65 led General Motors to a record $7.6-billion in profit off of $150.3-billion in sales. It was a big turnaround for the Detroit-based automaker who beforehand dealt with the economic downtown in the industry and the recall crisis. 

 

 

Akerson sped up his departure after his wife was recently diagnosed with an advanced stage of cancer.

 

“I will leave with great satisfaction in what we have accomplished, great optimism over what is ahead and great pride that we are restoring General Motors as America’s standard bearer in the global auto industry,” said Akerson.

 

 

Barra, 51 has some big shoes to fill, but with 33 years of experience at General Motors, she’s up for the task. 

 

“With an amazing portfolio of cars and trucks and the strongest financial performance in our recent history, this is an exciting time at today’s GM,” said Barra. “I’m honored to lead the best team in the business and to keep our momentum at full speed.”

 

Barra’s career began as an intern on the factory floor, but quickly rose up the ranks to head product development and quality. Her three decades of experience in the manufacturing, engineering and management makes her a worthy candidate to succeed Akerson.

 
  • 0
  • Published in News
  • Written by
Subscribe to this RSS feed